《双城记》读后感
读完某一作品后，相信你一定有很多值得分享的收获，让我们好好写份读后感，把你的收获和感想记录下来吧。那么如何写读后感才能更有感染力呢？下面是小编精心整理的《双城记》读后感，欢迎大家借鉴与参考，希望对大家有所帮助。
《双城记》读后感1
These days I have read the well-known masterpiece A Tale of Two Cities. There are various roles in the book， and their relationship is amazing， which is unimaginabe.
The two cities mean England and Paris. The background of the novel is the big Revolution of France. The brutal Mrs.Defarge， innocent Charels， very kind Mr.Sydney Carden， and the devoted maiden gave me a deep impression.
I have a favorable impression about good persons while I hate the bad guys. Mr Carden was loyal to friends. He valued the sentiment among others. He fell in love with Lucy the first time he met her. Although Lucy refused him， his love for her was never changed. He even exchange himself for Lucy's husband to jail because he hoped Lucy would never be sad. This figure moved me so much.
《双城记》读后感2
As we all know， Charles Dickens' novel A Tale of Two Cities is a novelbased on the French Revolution in the late 1800s。 In that terrible time， everymoment was full of great fear。 Before that great revolution， the mon people，especially the peasants， were poor， hungry and unhappy。 The king and the noblemen maltreated the poor in many ways but they had never felt a little ashamed，on the contrary they thought they could do bad things in the nature ofthings。
As an outstanding writer， in Dickens's work， the language skill isessential。 Each kind of rhetoric technique， like the analogy， the exaggeration，the contrast， the humorous， and the taunt are handled skillfully and theartistry of the work is also delivered the peak。 A tale of two cities has itsdifference with the general historical novel， its character and the main plotare all fictionalizes。 With the broad real background of the French Revolution，the author take the fictional character Doctor Nanette’s experience as the mainclue， interweaves the unjust charge， love and revenge three independences butalso incident cross-correlation stories together， and the clue is plex。 Theauthor use narrates， foreshadowing， upholstery and so many techniques，causes the structure integrity and strictness， the plot winding anxious and richof theatrical nature， it displayed the remarkable artistic skill。 The style Atale of two cities is solemnity and melancholy， fills indignation， but l
acks the humor of the early works。
Besides， this novel criticizes the violence and oppression in the society。In this novel， the author not only expresses his humanitarianism on the lovebetween human beings， but also expresses his view according to his critics tothe violence and oppression in that society。 The author expresses his opinion ontwo parts。 First， he criticizes the aristocrats， esp。 the representative Marquisof Evremonde。 Second， he also criticizes the revolutionaries in the FrenchRevolution。 However， when we see from the description of the couple， the authordoes not think high of the revolution。 When the revolutionaries begin theirrevenge， the author describes that everyone is terrible， the man is terrible，the woman crazy， and there is not a human creature at that time。 We can seealthough the author does not show his agreement to the aristocrats’ cruelty， hedoes not like the bloody revolution， either。
What is more， this novel advocates the Christian love and self-sacrifice。Charles Dickens' novel A Tale of Two Cities is essentially a tale of love，sacrifice， and， most importantly， resurrection。 Dr。 Manette， Charles Darnay， andSydney Carton， all desperate men leading catastrophic lives， make greatsacrifices in order to attain true physical， spiritual， and societalresurrection for themselves and the ones they love。 In this novel， the authorportrays some typical characters that embody the author’s view。 First， heportrays some kind， upright and humane persons， such as Dr。 Manette， LucieManette， Mr。 Lorry， etc。 But at the same time， he also portrays some cruel andferocious persons， such as the Marquis of Evremonde Brothers， Mr。 and Mrs。Defarge。 He uses these characters to make a contrast， which clearly expresseshis view。 In short， what he was trying to express is that everyone can love eachother and sacrifice for others。 So Sydney Carton is the supreme embodiment o
f Charles Dickens’ humanitarianism。
Ultimately， A Taleof Two Cities is essentially a tale of love， sacrifice， and most importantly，resurrection。 Through personal sacrifices or sacrifices for those who theyloved， it shows the human’s virtue and integrity。 By struggling for， huntingfor， and sacrificing for a better life， all of the main characters are foreverresurrected in the hearts of those they love forever。
Overall， Charles Dickens is a humanitarian。 And according to the analysisof the characters in A Tales of Two Cities， we can see that the author advocatesthe universal love and equality between human beings。 And this is the basicelement in a peaceful and harmonious society。 Everyone should love people andonly the humanitarianism can improve this situation。 And A Tale of Two Cities isthe best work， which embodies his humanitarianism。 So that we can see thatCharles Dickens is an outstanding humanitarian of the capitalistic reformism inthe 19th century。
《双城记》读后感3
生命有两座城，一个住着死亡。一个住着永生。
虽然《双城记》是一本经典的小说，但因为其明确提出这段革命背景是法国，于是对革命的表现就被认为是作者的历史观。而这正是对小说无数争议的焦点。狄更斯在小说中除了以细腻的笔墨展示了贵族的残忍，同样也展示了革命群众非理性的破坏。他认为，革命是一种压迫取代了另一种压迫，一场直接浓重的血腥替代了另外一场血腥。对攻占巴士底狱以及对民众的一系列描写——血腥，残忍，狡诈，恶毒是小说最为引人注目的地方。
狄更斯把在描写暴民邪恶之处倾心了大量的笔墨，展示了他对暴民的痛恨，从某种层度上可以说是对革命的痛恨。当然，作为人道主义者的狄更斯也指出了拯救世界的良药：爱。
我非常喜欢卡顿。实际上，卡顿就是狄更斯的化身，狄更斯正是首先想到了卡顿这个人和他身上的某种精神进而构思成这本小说的。小说中描述：“太阳悲悲切切，切切悲悲的冉冉升起，它所照见的'景物，没有比这个人更惨的了。他富有才华，情感高尚，却没有施展才华流露情感的机会，不能有所作为，也无力谋取自己的幸福。他深知自己的症结所在，却听天由命，任凭自己年复一年的虚度光阴，消耗殆尽。”
被自己遗弃的悲观者——卡顿，在朋友遇到困难，在所钟爱的女子的丈夫即将被送上断头台时，他突然出现，被救人还不之所以的情况下，以自己的生命做代价，在紧要关头使了个掉包计策救出了自己的所爱女子的丈夫。
这不正是基督之爱么，为自己赎了罪而消亡。事实上，小说中的卡顿也确实以圣经的口吻在临死前说，“复活在我，生命在我，信我的人，虽然死了，也必复活；凡活着信我的人，必永远不死。”这就是狄更斯为“最坏的时代”开出的良药，然而这毕竟是一种理想。有人说，《双城记》作为一部不朽的著作，如果没有西德尼。卡顿的存在和所作所为，这部小说就失去了它的价值和光辉。我完全赞同。
也许，每个人的生命都有两座城：一个住着死亡，一个住着永生。
《双城记》读后感4
Today, I finally read the book of two cities by the British writer Charles Dickens. After reading this book, I was in a long mood.
Novels in the 18th century French revolution as the background, the story will be in Paris, London, link up the two big cities, a narrative horse nate doctor is full of love and adventure, interspersed with the noble's cruelty, people's anger, trial spy... It mainly reveals the social order of the British and French in that period, and the life of the nobles and the ordinary people.
The book focuses on the fact that poor Dr Manette, who had been imprisoned in the bastille for 19 years by the aristocracy, had his daughter taken to live in England. In court, the father and daughter met the French nobleman darley and the poor master carton. Later, manette's daughter Lucy and darley married, and after ten years of happy family life, caton also gave Lucy a promise to make Lucy happy.
The people living in poor and helpless, cold and hunger, the plight of poor sickness repeatedly, suffered oppression, their hearts a backlog of deep and deep hatred of nobility, finally triggered the French revolution to overthrow the regime, for freedom. After the outbreak of the French revolution, darley went to France to defend his innocent servant, but he was arrested for being a French aristocrat. And carton, in order to make the promise of lucie's life happy, used him to be similar to darley, and, before he was sentenced to death, he replaced him with Dudley, and replaced him with the guillotine.
The dark ages have passed, the days of hope and light have come, and the darkness is terrible! At first, the world belongs to the king, and later, the world belongs to the people. On July 13, 1789, the people stormed the bastille, where political prisoners were held; On January 21, 1793, the revolution brought king Louis xvi to the guillotine, which symbolized the end of feudal rule. On 20 February 1793, the first republic of France was established.
The 18th century, full of darkness and oppression, is gone, and the miserable life of the people is over. We have ushered in the 21st century, which is to be bathed in hope, and the long years from that era to today are as brief as they were yesterday. I think that the spirit of carton is worthy of our study, he is affectionate, he keeps his promise, in order to fulfill his promise to Lucy, at all costs, including precious life.
The people of today will never let history repeat itself, nor will history repeat itself. Let us live each day and make our 21st century more glorious!
《双城记》读后感5
为了你，为了你所亲爱的任何人，我愿意做任何事情。倘若我的生命中有值得牺牲的可能和机会，名人名言大全摘抄
我甘愿为你和你所爱的人们而牺牲。
——西德尼·卡尔顿
就这样被感动了。它是一部波澜壮阔的历史，它是一个感人肺腑的故事，它更是一种纯洁而高尚的爱。它就是狄更斯笔下的小说《双城记》。全书充溢着扑朔迷离的色彩，作者以一连串引人入胜的故事为框架，以十八世纪法国大革命为背景。在黑暗的资本主义社会里，农民阶级和工人阶级忍受着资产阶级无情的剥削。正如作者所说：“昌盛而又衰微，笃诚而又多疑，光明而又黑暗，这是充满阳光期望的黎明，又是阴暗失望的长夜，人们拥有一切，却两手空空。”而主人公西德尼·卡尔顿、露西·曼内特和查尔斯·达尔内之间真挚的情感，成为这部名著亮丽的一笔。
在小说中，狄更斯成功地塑造了主要人物鲜明的个性。曼内特是个深爱女儿的.父亲，在经历磨难后仍宽容地把女儿嫁给仇人的儿子；露西是温柔善良的贤妻良母，为了让丈夫能看自己一眼每一天风雨不改地到大墙对面站立两小时；查尔斯是个正直、豁达的贵族，与露西相爱，为了感情甘愿放下爵位与财产。
小说中还有一个人物，就是让人有点憎恶的泰雷兹·德伐日。失去亲人使她活着的唯一好处就是革命胜
利之时为亲人报仇。但是等到革命胜利时，她许多年来梦寐以求的复仇却失去了对象，她的愤怒之深是可
以想象的，然而为了发泄积愤却拿侯爵兄弟的儿子及其家人抵罪，她走上了一条与那些伪贵族同样残忍的
道路，于是她的种种行为使她一步步失去了读者的谅解。最后，恶人有恶报，她戏剧性地正因走火而
结束了自己充满仇恨的一辈子。也许这才是她最佳的结局。那些像德伐日那样以复仇为生活唯一目的的人，
即使命运坎坷，也决不能博得人们的同情。
而在整篇小说中，最让我喜爱也是最令人感动的就是律师助手——西德尼·卡尔顿。他一出场就带着一身忧郁，隐去了光芒，总是灰心、失望、冷漠、凄凉。他妥协于周围环境，但有时却又显得格格不入，作为律师助手的他才华出众，却甘情绪愿躲在人后，做别人成功的垫脚石，他仿佛亲手筑起了一堵墙，隔绝了名利、社会，默默地逗留在角落里。他与查尔斯长得十分相似，也同样深爱着露西，然而两者命运却截然不一样。他羡慕查尔斯，也恨他。可在经历痛苦的煎熬后，他依旧带着诚挚的祝福，愿露西与查尔斯永远幸福，正因“爱比恨更为强有力得多”。这个表面上懒散、放纵的“无用之徒”，内心却是崇高而纯洁的。
最后，他向露西表达了自己的情感。每次读起那段话，难免感到心酸，“我期望你知道你是我灵魂最后的梦。我是在堕落的生活中看见你和你的父亲，还有你所经营的那个甜蜜的家，才恢复了我心中自以为早己死去的往日的梦想。我也因此才感到比任何时候都要凄凉可怜。自从我见到你以后，我才为一种原以为不会再谴责我的悔恨所苦恼。我听到我以为早已永远沉默的往日的声音在悄悄地催我上进…………”
当查尔斯正因家族的犯罪而被无辜判决死刑，西德尼竟然代替他去断头台理解行刑。在生命与爱之间，他选取了后者。他爱露西，为了她的幸福，他为她的爱人献出自己的生命。当他走上断头台的时候，面上依然持续着笑容，他信守对露西的诺言……正因，他的爱便是他的生命。此时此刻，我的脑海中想起了裴多菲的那首诗：“我愿意是急流/山里的小河/在崎岖的路上/岩石上经过/只要我的爱人是一条小鱼/在我的浪花中快乐地游来游去……”
尽管小说以一个意外的“大团圆”收场，但当读者流着眼泪读完该书时，却感到无限的遗憾、心酸。有人说感情是自私的，但在狄更斯的小说《双城记》中，我却能深深地感受到一种超脱世俗的最纯洁、最崇高的爱。它隐藏在内心深处，但却无比的深厚；它默默地承受煎熬，为的只是使心爱的人幸福；它总是无私地付出，而不求一点儿的回报。这种爱在无形中上升到一个新境界，永恒地放着凄美而迷人的光彩。
“为了你，为了你所亲爱的任何人，我愿意做任何事情。倘若我的生命中有值得牺牲的可能和机会，我甘愿为你和你所爱的人们而牺牲。”
《双城记》读后感6
"A tale of two cities" is one of Dickens's most important representative works. The novel profoundly exposed the society contradiction before the French Revolution, intensely attacks the aristocratic social class is dissolute and cruel, and sincerely sympathizes with the depressed classes. The novel also described many magnificent scenes like the revolt people attacked Bastille and so on, which displayed people's great strength.
The novel has portrayed many different people. Doctor Manette is honest and kind but suffers the persecution actually , Lucie is beautiful and gentle , Charles is graceful and noble, Lorry is upright and honest , Sydney is semblance of indifferent, innermost feelings of warm, unconventional but also selfless and lofty, Miss Pross is straightforward and loyal, Evremonde brothers are cruel and sinister…The plex hatred is hard to solve, the cruel revenge has made more hatreds, loves rebirth in the hell edge, but take the life as the price.
As an outstanding writer, in Dickens's work, the language skill is essential. Each kind of rhetoric technique, like the analogy, the exaggeration, the contrast, the humorous, and the taunt are handled skillfully, and the artistry of the work is also delivered the peak.
"A tale of two cities" has its difference with the general historical novel, its character and the main plot are all fictionalizes. With the broad real background of the French Revolution, the author take the fictional character Doctor Manette's experience as the main clue, interweaves the unjust charge, love and revenge three independences but also incident cross-correlation stories together, the plot is criss-crossed, and the clue is plex. The author use narrates, foreshadowing, upholstery and so many techniques, causes the structure integrity and strictness, the plot winding anxious and rich of theatrical nature, it displayed the remarkable artistic skill. The style "A tale of two cities" is solemnity and melancholy, fills indignantion, but lacks the humor of the early works.
《双城记》读后感7
查尔斯·狄更斯的《双城记》篇幅并不长，但是，却读了半个月之久。实在是因为刚开始的时候，并没有太读懂，对于当时的时代背景，西欧的风俗习惯都不了解。直到现在，虽然已经读到了结尾，其实对作者本身要表达的当时法国大革命的一些令人“废解”的景象，并没有更尽一步的了解。
但是通过对这部著作的学习，我有几点需要思考的地方：
首先，是什么让一个本该受人同情女人变成了让读者希望她早点死去的角色。泰雷兹·德伐日是个苦大仇深的人物，她为了复仇，甚至失去了作为普通人应有的怜悯之心，她不但把达尔内送上了断头台，还要把本是受害者的曼内特医生，以及达尔内的妻女也“斩草除根”。她的每次出现，她的言论，甚至让人觉得疯狂、可怕、恐惧，她给人带来的是一种无可救药的绝望。
其次，是什么让民众面对囚犯时先后能有截然不同的两种态度。让我吃惊的是，在第一次达尔内被捕时，当时的民众在得知达尔内的“罪过”后，希望他马上被处以死刑的急迫心情，和当法庭宣布他无罪时民众们所表现出来的欢喜之情，形成了鲜明的对比，让人无法理解。
再次，是什么让一位本来欲自暴自弃过一辈子的人，为了所爱的人，竟然可以献出了生命。西德尼·卡尔顿对爱情的执着让人钦佩，他成了全书中最具灵魂的角色。所以把最后他的.话（作者认为他的想法会是这样）抄录在下：
“我看见巴萨、克莱、德伐日、复仇女神、陪审员、法官，一长串新的压迫者从被这个惩罚工具所摧毁的老压迫者们身上升起，又在这个惩罚工具还没有停止使用前被消灭。我看见一座美丽的城市和一个灿烂的民族从这个深渊中升起。在他们争取真正的自由的奋斗中，在他们的胜利与失败之中，在未来的漫长岁月中，我看见这一时代的邪恶和前一时代的邪恶（后者是前者的自然结果）逐渐赎去自己的罪孽，并逐渐消失。
“我看见我为之献出生命的人在英格兰过着平静、有贡献、兴旺、幸福的生活——我是再也见不到英格兰了。我见到露西胸前抱着个以我命名的孩子。我看见露西的父亲衰老了、背陀了，其它方面却复了原，并以他的医术踏实地济世救人，过着平静的生活。我看见他们的好友，那个善良的老人，在十年之后把他的财产赠送给了他们，并平静地逝世，去接受主的报偿。
“我看见我在他们和他们无数代后裔心里占有神圣的地位。我看见露西成了个龙钟老妇，在我的祭日为我哭泣。我看见她跟她的丈夫正结束生命的历程，并排躺在弥留的榻上。我知道他俩彼此在对方的灵魂中占有光荣崇高的地位，而我在他俩灵魂中的地位则更光荣、更崇高。
“我看见躺在她怀里的以我命名的孩子长大成人，在我曾走过的道路上奋勇前行。我看见他业绩优异，以他的光耀使我的名字辉煌。我看见我染在那名字上的污迹消失。我看见他站在公平正直的法官和光明磊落的人们的最前列。我看见他带了一个又以我命名的孩子来到这里。那时这里已是一片美景，全没了今天的扭曲和丑恶。那孩子长了个我所熟悉的前额和一头鑫发。我听见他告诉我孩子我的故事，声音颤抖，带着深情。
“我现在已做的远比我所做过的一切都美好；我将获得的休息远比我所知道的一切都甜蜜。”
“复活在我，生命也在我，信仰我的人虽然死了，也必复活；凡活着信仰我的人，必永远不死。”（《圣经新约约翰福音》第十一章第二十五节。这是耶稣因乞丐拉撒路之死说的。其后耶稣来到拉撒路墓前，死去已四天的虔信耶稣的拉撒路果然复活，体现了“凡活着信仰我的人，必永远不死”的意思。这句话是卡尔顿父亲墓碑上的铭文。）
《双城记》读后感8
After reading "A tale of two cities"
"A tale of two cities" is one of Dickens's most important representative works.The novel profoundly exposed the society contradiction before the French Revolution,intensely attacks the aristocratic social class is dissolute and cruel,and sincerely sympathizes with the depressed classes.The novel also described many magnificent scenes like the revolt people attacked Bastille and so on,which displayed people's great strength. The novel has portrayed many different people. Doctor Manette is honest and kind but suffers the persecution actually , Lucie is beautiful and gentle ,Charles is graceful and noble,Lorry is upright and honest ,Sydney is semblance of indifferent, innermost feelings of warm,unconventional but also selfless and lofty,Miss Pross is straightforward and loyal,Evremonde brothers are cruel and sinister......The plex hatred is hard to solve, the cruel revenge has made more hatreds, loves rebirth in the hell edge,but take the life as the price. As an outstanding w
riter,in Dickens's work,the language skill is essential.Each kind of rhetoric technique,like the analogy,the exaggeration,the contrast,the humorous,and the taunt are handled skillfully,and the artistry of the work is also delivered the peak."A tale of two cities" has its difference with the general historical novel, its character and the main plot are all fictionalizes.With the broad real background of the French Revolution,the author take the fictional character Doctor Manette's experience as the main clue,interweaves the unjust charge, love and revenge three independences but also incident cross-correlation stories together,the plot is criss-crossed,and the clue is plex.The author use narrates,foreshadowing,upholstery and so many techniques,causes the structure integrity and strictness,the plot winding anxious and rich of theatrical nature,it displayed the remarkable artistic skill.the style "A tale of two cities" is solemnity and melancholy,fills indignantion,but lacks the
humor of the early works.
《双城记》读后感9
I believe that everyone who has seen a tale of two cities will be impressed by the shock. The book by dickens, a famous British writer, is immortal! Classic is classic, no matter how many years later, classics still sending out the bright luster, the ups and downs, what's more, the book story unimaginable a bizarre plot twists and turns, the master is the master, to make you know the story is fictional, but still as the story of the people and things, or moved, or anger, or sadness, or tears, don't you don't admire master ability of fiction.
Dickens in a tale of two cities revealed before the outbreak of the French revolution, the nobility of the ruthless oppression, depending on the masses of poor people mean dog, failure, and finally an outbreak of the French revolution, poor people after long-term brutal oppression, crazy revenge for the noble class, the same ruthless trial authority and the judgment of their lives, blood is blood, blinded by hate glasses, blood excited nerve, head to the ground, but vengeance will solve the problem? Can you live a happy life? This is the question dickens raised in his book. If the authorities have more compassion and more love for the people, so that everyone will not be oppressed, or the revolution will not break out, we must know that the working people's demands on society are very low and low! The revolution should be a warning to those in power. Worth fortunately, in the 20th century, we this s our authorities, whether China, wen jiabao, or Mr Obama in the United States, they are put forward for all to common prosperity, let everyone enjoy the fruit of social and economic development, they think that favor the rich society not only moral, also a serious threat to social stability.
Love and tolerance is the good idea, because saw a pair of noble brother destroyed the crimes of a poor family, was framed in the bastille 18 years of doctor, doctor angry in prison, he secretly recorded the persecuted, vowed to heaven and earth, accused of aristocrats and their children and grandchildren, until the last one, in the years of imprisonment, the doctor lost his head, do the shoes has become the only sustenance to sustain life. After his release from prison, his father returned to his senses with his daughter's deep love for his father. With great love and tolerance, he agreed to the marriage of his daughter.
When with a picture of the ceiling look up court appearance of Mr. Carlton, gives the impression of how unruly and arrogant, although he talented, although he has a heart of precious, but because of the darkness of the society, he chose the debauchery, chose the cynicism, chose the ceremony, Carlton love Lucy how pure and selfless, he chose when Lucy happiness silently blessing, secretly guardian beside her, when Lucy need a bailout, he chose to his own life in exchange for Lucy her husband's life, to ensure the happiness of Lucy, although I do not believe that the world really can have such feelings, but I still deep compassion, pity, Carlton, great respect for his feelings, hope all tender belong to him, to comfort his wounded heart.
The children who were persecuted by the aristocrats, the hatred of the heart, the revenge became the knife axe, the symbol of the vengeance, the death of the goddess of vengeance is not a metaphor for the price of revenge?
Hatred, tolerance, love! This all let us deeply ponder introspection! Carlton's words are supposed to be all the best footnote: this age of sin, and bring forth the previous era of nature of sin to offset by themselves, and gradually disappeared, a beautiful peace loving era will be born!
After reading the story, do you still have jingling shoes in your mind? Still in the doctor's gloom, sad helplessness and tears of anger? Still in tears for carton? Still sighing for madame Defarge? I think you must be in the doctor family finally happy peace and silent blessing!
《双城记》读后感10
个在人类历史上留下了血的印证的不可磨灭的悲惨时代，猜疑、仇恨、惶恐、屠掠的疯狂侵略下人心惶惶。“既然死亡是大自然用来消除万物的灵丹妙药”，那么，在这个混乱的时代，各式各样的死刑无疑是统治者们“清洗”这场由大革命所带来的阴影的“最好利器”。
狄更斯在小说中以细腻的笔墨展示了贵族的残忍与革命群众非理性的破坏。透过贵族与平民之间的仇恨冲突，让我们看到，鲜血无法洗去仇恨，杀戮无法平定动乱，更不能替代爱。
在这矛盾、冗乱的时代下，狄更斯成功塑造了西德尼。卡顿——“他富有才华，情感高尚，却没有施展才华流露情感的机会，不能有所作为，也无力谋取自己的幸福。他深知自己的症结所在，却听天由命，任凭自己年复一年的虚度光阴，消耗殆尽”。 西德尼。卡顿的存在是一场幸福的悲剧，他孤独，他忧郁，他用冷漠的外表面对世间百态，他用“若无其事”杜绝身边的名与利，他爱上了露西，却不愿去追求，他的善良让他担心露西会因他堕落，当他最终他向露西表达了爱情，令人动容。
“为了你，为了你所爱的任何人，我愿意作任何事情。倘若我的生涯中有值得牺牲的可能和机会，我甘愿为你和你所爱的人们而牺牲。”——西德尼。卡顿
我以为，这样的爱是广义的，如梦幻般伟大而纯净，催人泪下，它默默承受着煎熬，“孤独”面对着酷刑，它也许忧伤但充满幸福，它可能凄美但并不单薄，在无形中，放出动人光彩，成为经典。卡顿如同黑暗里的精灵，像是“星星之火”点燃真爱，
卡顿的离开平静且从容，但我明白，走想向爱的祭坛，不光靠勇气，更珍贵的.只那一份感人肺腑的“博爱”！也许卡顿的牺牲正是一种重生，因为他在坦然中透过了死亡看到了希望，看到了未来。
我想，如果狄更斯用大革命下的世间百态，人性万千堆砌起了《双城记》的血肉，那他就用西德尼。卡顿铸造了《双城记》的灵魂。也许遗憾，也许辛酸，更多是祝愿与感动——最纯净，最永恒的爱，像永不凋零的春天永远鲜活的存在。
《双城记》读后感11
那是最完美的时代，那是最糟糕的时代;那是智慧的年头，那是愚昧的年头;那是信仰的时期，那是怀疑的时期;那是光明的季节，那是黑暗的季节;那是期望的春天，那是失望的冬天;我们全都在直奔天堂，我们全都在直奔相反的'方向--简而言之，那时跟此刻十分相象，某些最喧嚣的权威坚持要用形容词的最高级来形容它。说它好，是最高级的;说它不好，也是最高级的。
这是整本书的开头第一章，将全书的基调定上了杯具色彩，然而就在这矛盾的时代中，也确实存在过光明。
这本书叙述了法国大革命时期围绕在医生马奈特一家周围的事，这本书颠覆了我对自由，权利以及善恶的看法——法国人民不堪重负，推翻了波旁王朝，然而新政权建立之后朝他们走来的难道是他们心驰神往的自由吗?不，仍然是以往的提心吊胆，稍不留神明天就会被送上断头台。得势之后的德发日太太滥用职权，将死敌们个个置于死地，最后却落得个惨死的下场。正如那句话所说的：“自由啊，有多少罪恶是假借你的名义干出来的。”大革命并不如想象中的那么完美，而是以暴易暴。它没有拯救人民，而是将人民推入了另一个火坑。
再来看看另外一位大革命的牺牲品——达内，革命前，他放下了国内的家业，只身来到英国谋生，在他看来，压迫人民是一件极不人道的事，然而，革命爆发后，他反而无辜地成为人民的敌人，大家不分青红皂白地要将他领上断头台。但是坚信在九死一生之后，他依然是原先那个善良的达内。
而卡顿——一个才华横溢却自甘堕落的律师，他与达内有着相同的长相，却有着不一样的命运，在应对活着还是让自己心爱的人得到幸福的抉择时，毅然决然的选取了后者，在他看来，生命在爱的面前是微不足道的，即使在断头台上，他也表现出了令人难以想象的沉着冷静。正因在他的心底，一向有一个信念在支持他：“耶稣说，复活在我，生命也在我，信我的人，虽然死了，也必复活。凡活着信我的人，必永远不死。”他用死完成了自我救赎，他用死来反抗虚伪的革命者，他用死来诠释对露丝的爱。生命，成了他最后的武器，爱，成了他唯一的支柱。
《双城记》读后感12
As we all know， Charles Dickens' novel A Tale of Two Cities is a novel based on the French Revolution in the late 1800s. In that terrible time， every moment was full of great fear. Before that great revolution， the mon people， especially the peasants， were poor， hungry and unhappy. The king and the noble men maltreated the poor in many ways but they had never felt a little ashamed， on the contrary they thought they could do bad things in the nature of things.
As an outstanding writer， in Dickens's work， the language skill is essential. Each kind of rhetoric technique， like the analogy， the exaggeration， the contrast， the humorous， and the taunt are handled skillfully and the artistry of the work is also delivered the peak. A tale of two cities has its difference with the general historical novel， its character and the main plot are all fictionalizes. With the broad real background of the French Revolution， the author take the fictional character Doctor Nanette’s experience as the main clue， interweaves the unjust charge， love and revenge three independences but also incident cross-correlation stories together， and the clue is plex. The author use narrates， foreshadowing， upholstery and so many techniques， causes the structure integrity and strictness， the plot winding anxious and rich of theatrical nature， it displayed the remarkable artistic skill. The style A tale of two cities is solemnity and melancholy， fills indignation， but l
acks the humor of the early works.
Besides， this novel criticizes the violence and oppression in the society. In this novel， the author not only expresses his humanitarianism on the love between human beings， but also expresses his view according to his critics to the violence and oppression in that society. The author expresses his opinion on two parts. First， he criticizes the aristocrats， esp. the representative Marquis of Evremonde. Second， he also criticizes the revolutionaries in the French Revolution. However， when we see from the description of the couple， the author does not think high of the revolution. When the revolutionaries begin their revenge， the author describes that everyone is terrible， the man is terrible， the woman crazy， and there is not a human creature at that time. We can see although the author does not show his agreement to the aristocrats’ cruelty， he does not like the bloody revolution， either.
What is more， this novel advocates the Christian love and self-sacrifice. Charles Dickens' novel A Tale of Two Cities is essentially a tale of love， sacrifice， and， most importantly， resurrection. Dr. Manette， Charles Darnay， and Sydney Carton， all desperate men leading catastrophic lives， make great sacrifices in order to attain true physical， spiritual， and societal resurrection for themselves and the ones they love. In this novel， the author portrays some typical characters that embody the author’s view. First， he portrays some kind， upright and humane persons， such as Dr. Manette， Lucie Manette， Mr. Lorry， etc. But at the same time， he also portrays some cruel and ferocious persons， such as the Marquis of Evremonde Brothers， Mr. and Mrs. Defarge. He uses these characters to make a contrast， which clearly expresses his view. In short， what he was trying to express is that everyone can love each other and sacrifice for others. So Sydney Carton is the supreme embodiment o
f Charles Dickens’ humanitarianism.
Ultimately， A Tale of Two Cities is essentially a tale of love， sacrifice， and most importantly， resurrection. Through personal sacrifices or sacrifices for those who they loved， it shows the human’s virtue and integrity. By struggling for， hunting for， and sacrificing for a better life， all of the main characters are forever resurrected in the hearts of those they love forever.
Overall， Charles Dickens is a humanitarian. And according to the analysis of the characters in A Tales of Two Cities， we can see that the author advocates the universal love and equality between human beings. And this is the basic element in a peaceful and harmonious society. Everyone should love people and only the humanitarianism can improve this situation. And A Tale of Two Cities is the best work， which embodies his humanitarianism. So that we can see that Charles Dickens is an outstanding humanitarian of the capitalistic reformism in the 19th century.
《双城记》读后感13
“那个时代同现今这个时代竟然如此惟妙惟肖。”双城，是英国和法国。
“双城”，是贵族与雅克。又是一本初读几个篇章觉得枯燥乏味，但越往后就越欲罢不能了，感觉像品果酒，后劲很强。他可以在前面穿插着各种你所不理解的情节，然后用一根根分明的线将他们连成一副世界名画。你能从组成那画的各个部分品茗出不同的小画，跟香水的前调中调后调相似，每一部分都让你拥有不同的味道。
又很像品茶，最后留得余味久久不能散去，还很想再坐下嘬个一口，砸吧砸吧嘴再继续沉浸到那略苦却又令人无法抗拒的味道里。由着马奈特大夫的事情引开，那困扰着老人的“足音”一遍一遍地敲打着他的耳朵，然后开始敲打着他女儿丈夫的耳朵，他女儿的耳朵。最后那令人恐惧的“足音”终于消失了，随着那个以血浇灌“吉洛汀”女士的人的消失而永远消失了。
那一天永远过去了。（“十二点永远过去了。”）
读到最后，我在想，雅克们的革命是为了让时代更好吗？他们如何知道所处的时代是比以前好的呢？是因为可以随意审处他人？还是因为自己手里捏着可以随意斩头的武器？可以不分青红皂白的举报，还是可以不顾善恶的夺取一个人的性命（尽管这个人是无辜的）？
在贵族的时代，他们觉得自己的时代是最好的，而雅克们觉得那个时代是最坏的。在雅克的时代，他们觉得自己的时代是最好的，而贵族们觉得那个时代是最坏的。
所以，“那一长串从旧的压迫者毁灭消亡的废墟上兴起的新压迫者”，并不是没有原因的。不自由，平等，博爱毋宁死的口号到最后产生了一具具无辜的'尸体，所以罗兰夫人才会在死前喊出：“自由，多少罪恶假汝之名进行。”
但尽管如此，每个时代都有逆流而上的英雄和真正的勇士。我喜欢卡屯，是崇拜的那种喜欢，也夹杂着他对露茜的那种喜欢。他的出场并不怎么精彩，大家好像都不怎么喜欢这个人，觉得他没有出息，他自己也是这么觉得的。他好像在遇见露茜之前，不知道自己的前路是什么，未来在哪里。遇见之后，他便知道了，也履行了自己当初对露茜许下的约定。
“耶稣说，复活在我，生命也在我；信我的人，虽然死了，也必复活；凡活着信我的人，必永远不死。”——基督教安葬祷文
他送给了他自己。
看到最终章的时候，悲伤好像从四面八方涌来，冲开了那道叫做“情绪”的门。刚好有个比较有意思的事情，我的台灯好像在应景一般，隔着三五八分钟灭一次，不到十秒又亮起来，像是卡屯用摩斯电码给我传递他的心情。
“我现在做的是一桩大好事情，远远胜过我一向所作所为。我现在去的是一处大好归宿，远远胜过我一向所知所解。”巧，我写读后感的时候台灯又开始明明灭灭了。
《双城记》读后感14
《双城记》是美国最伟大的作家之一——查尔斯·狄更斯写的。他1812年出生于普茨茅斯，1870年去世。他出身贫寒，但在不幸的童年过后，他很快便变得富有和成功。他还写过好多著名小说，如：《雾都孤儿》。《远大前程》等等。
《双城记》主要是记载了1775年，在巴黎的一家酒馆的楼上的一间屋子里坐着一位白发男人，他正忙着做鞋。他曾在巴士底狱当了18年的囚徒。现在他已是一个自由人了，然而他却不知道自己的名字，也人不吃他的朋友。他所知道的就是他必须继续做鞋。
在一辆去巴黎的车上坐着路茜，这是她从未见过面的女儿。路茜把她父亲带回了伦敦，在女儿的爱心和照料之下，他忘掉了过去并学会了冲向一个自由人那样去生活。
然而在法国大革命的暴风雨年代，过去既没有消失也没有被忘记。于是不久的危险秘密地把路茜和她所爱的人们带回了巴黎……那儿恐怖的死亡机器——断头台正饥饿的等待着法兰西的敌人们。
这里的主人公很显然就是揭穿了当时社会的黑暗和腐败。一个原来当了18年的囚徒，什么也不记得的男人，最后又被自己从未见过面的`女儿路茜带回了伦敦，开始了一个自由人的生活，但最终他的女儿和她所爱的人们都回到了黑暗的巴黎，被法兰西的敌人们处死了！
《双城记》读后感15
A Love and Hate in A Tale of Two Cities Many have grown fond of the taleinvolving the noble， former Fr ench aristocrat， who had virtually unmatched(except maybe in boo ks) good fortune。 First， his life was saved by the pitifultestimony of a beautiful young woman。 Anyone would gladly have married th isbeautiful too-good-to-be-true-woman he wedded。 It is later seen， however， thatthis man should have married her even if she were u gly as sin。 This was not thecase though， and he married a beautif ul woman， who had an admirer who was adead ringer for her hus band， was a loser， and would give his life to keep herfrom pain， all of which really es in handy when her hubby is on his way to theguillotine。 This is not the story of a man with multiple gua rdian angels， butrather that of a character in Charles Dickens' nove l A Tale of Two Cities。 Askeptic could easily see this as an unbe lievable， idealistic and overratednovel that is too far-fetched。 An u nbiased reader， however， can see
that this is a story of love and ha te， each making up the bare-bones ofthe novel so that one must l ook closely to see Dickens' biases， attempts atpersuasion， and unbe lievable plot-lines， some of which are spawned fromDickens' love and hate， and some of which love and hate are used to develop。
The more lifeless of the characters we are supposed to like--the Ma nettes，Darnay， Lorry-- play their parts in the idyllic fashion Dicken s and like-mindedreaders want， a fashion made inflexible by circu mstances and purposes。"Circumstances and purposes" refers in larg e part to Dickens' state of mind andobjective。 Dickens' intrusive， u nusually editorial point of view， withreferences to "I" and deviatio ns from narration for monologue， reveals thenovel's slavery to the teachings of his morals--or perhaps his own slavery tothe morals o f his time and Protestantism。 Therefore， can Lucie be any differentfrom the supportive， wholly feminine wife and mother she is? Not if Dickens' isto stick to his obligation， or perhaps obstinate purpos e， of moral teachings。With that aside， what is to be said of Dickens' teaching， his presen tation oflove and hate? They both have one thing in mon: the characters representing eachare unmistakable at a mile away。 The moment Lucie Manette is put before
the reader's eyes， her tumblin g blond locks， her bright blue eyes， herseventeen-year-old， slight， p retty (but not sexy!) figure and all， he knowsthat， not only will sh e not be a villainous， unlikable character， but she willbe the epito me of the good， beautiful woman (and later housewife)， the one Dickens thought every women should be。 At this young woman's intr oduction withMr。 Lorry， she curtseys to him， and Dickens wastes
no time in pointing out that "young ladies made curtseys in those days"。The introductory scene climaxes at fair Lucie's fainting， one that， to some，puts her unflawed position into question， although to Dickens， it reinforces it。At the other side of this moral lecture are the Defarges。 Call Dicke ns a masterfor embodying qualities， but here are another flawless pair--flawlessly evil，and sentenced to evil from the moment we see Madame Defarge's "watchful eye thatseldom seemed to look at a nything， a large hand heavily ringed， a steady face，strong features， and great posure of manner"， a stark contrast to the slight，fai nting figure of Mada-- or rather， Miss Manette。 To further turn us againstgood old Madame Defarge， Dickens has her using a toothpi ck publicly in heropening scene， an activity dainty Miss Manette wouldn't dream of。 Finally， wemustn't forget the setting。 Lucie ma y have been born in France， but shedefected to England， and trave led from London to meet Mr。 Lorr
y。 Madame Defarge was a Frenc hwoman， born and living amongst peasants whodrank wine scoope d off of mud。 She probably was not taught Dickens' (and hisprima ry English audience's) Protestant morals in her Catholic nation， andcertainly did not manifest them。
In arguably the book's first touching scene (some say it's the one whereCarton is on his way to the guillotine)， Lucie goes through much trouble to coaxher father from his insanity， laying her head on his shoulder， and trusting aman she had never met。 When Mad ame Defarge sought vengeance for the cruelinjustice mitted ag ainst her kin， she looked to destroy not only the innocentdescende nt of the culprit， but his family-- an old man， a young woman， an d alittle girl。 These two characters' love and hate are unconditional and total。Did this have to be so? Could not Madame Defarge ha ve showed one bit offemininity， of human kindness? Could Lucie not have stolen a contemptuous glanceat her persecutors? Not with Dickens at the helm。 Lucie and Defarge are createdwith a convic tion， and once Dickens' plot was laid， the blinders he put on hisc haracters allowed only one route。 Perhaps it was a primitive style， but moderncharacters are painted more realistically， with human w eaknesses and
more variability。 Did it have to be so? Could Dicken s have captured morereaders， especially in the long run， if he had pursued more varying actions inhis characters， as well as more h umanness and believability? Does this point toDickens as a flawed writer， with little imagination and ability? Another factorthat must be considered is our inability to criticize a n English--orEnglish-living--character， or to find a modicum of res
pectability in a French one， with two exceptions。 One is the young womanwho is beheaded just before Sydney Carton。 She is the en emy of an enemy， she isgoing to be killed， and she allows Dicke ns to teach another moral using SydneyCarton。 Why not have her happy to die for the benefit of her countrymen， whilenot trembling as she ascends to her death， thereby depriving the mon enemy of asmall victory? With the modern trend of political correctness and anti-racism， aTale of Two Cities written today would never le ave the word processor。 JerryCruncher is about the most sinful of the English (aside from a spy but，remember， he defected to Franc e)， and he repents by the end， which counts foranother moral fro m Dickens。 In Dickens' time， racism was not regarded as it istoda y， and so if he wanted to use the French Revolution to send a me ssage tothe population， it was his right， but he may have taken thi s too far for some。Today， Lucie Manette would by no means be taken seriously as
a believable， even likable character。 She persists in fainting at particularly stressful moments， but when her husband is before a heartless， bloodthirstyjury， she looks brave and strong just for him。 In cont ext， this was a screamingcontradiction， but one that Dickens requir ed to portray his Eve。 It is mucheasier to believe Madame Defarg e's hate than her opposition's love。 Defarge'ssister was raped and
murdered mercilessly and her brother was killed by a pair heartless"noblemen"。 It is much easier to understand Defarge's taste for blo od than thecondition of Manette， who， after practicing as a pet ent doctor and actingnormally for years， experiences a recurrence of his mental condition simplybecause his wonderful daughter has left for two weeks， although he has two dearfriends nearby。 Charles Dickens has built an enduring story enjoyed by millions，w hich is loved by experts and critics today although it would be im mediatelybutchered if written by a modern author。 It is a love stor y loved by itscreator， but wholly unbelievable。 It is actually doom ed by its own idealism andunrealistic characters。 As a hate story， i t is much more petent， although alsousing this for its own pur poses。 One can draw one's own conclusions and ideasfrom such a book， but facts are facts。
【《双城记》读后感】相关文章：
《双城记》读后感02-05
双城记的读后感04-08
双城记读后感03-28
《双城记》读后感10-09
双城记读后感10-05
双城记的读后感10-07
狄更斯的《双城记》读后感04-08
有关双城记读后感10-05
《双城记》读后感作文10-06